• 001. Workshops on team science - overview in a document
• 2.10 Bridging Cultures: Enhancing Team Talent Through Cross Cultural Communication (I)
• 2.9 The dreams and fears of the PhD in your team (G)
• 2.8 Unlocking the Potential: Recognizing and Leading Diverse Talent in Teams (G)
• 2.7 Embedding and sustaining research data and research software professionals within research teams and institutions (I)
• 2.6 Evaluating the impact of introducing narrative CV formats for research teams - unleash your meta-research ideas (I)
• 2.5 Diversity in hiring: a case study (G)
• 003. mmmAcademia: a card game about Recognition and Rewards in Academia (G)
• 2.3 When and How Does Team Science Improve Science? (G)
• 2.2 Journey of Progress game: building a Theory of Change for diverse teams (G)
• 2.1 Building an academic environment to facilitate transdisciplinary team science (G)
• 1.10 Gift economies and formal reward systems within Leiden University (G)
• 1.9 Recognizing diverse PhD trajectories: Rethinking doctoral assessment (G)
• 1.8 How to build a talented team (G)
• 1.7 Diversifying teams and talents: Recognising the value added by research professionals (G)
• 1.6 Challenges in the recognition and rewards of Open Science: time to move forward (G)
• 1.5 How to unlock your team potential: a collaborative workshop (I)
• 1.4 Teamwork: it's not just a game (G)
• 1.3 Acknowledge talent for the future (I)
• 1.2 PubQuiz: How Evidence-Based is your vision on team science? (G)
• 1.1 Identity and Expectations in the early career researcher experience (G)
• From words to deeds-concrete actions to reward and assess societal impact
• Good practice: writing and assessing impact narratives
• 1.6 Interdisciplinary collaborations: business as unusual?
• 1.5 How does leadership become everyone's
• 2.1 Recognizing open science in research assessments: Issues, challenges, and opportunities
• 1.4 From words to deeds: concrete actions to reward and assess societal impact
• 2.10 Research Quality Assessment in an era of change: is it possible to develop and operationalize a framework that embraces the current debate and needs of the community?
• 2.9 Reimaging assessment: how to balance between the individual and the team
• 2.4 Devising career tracks and criteria: the process as part of the change
• 1.9 Recognizing the diversity of Open Science Practices across different research communities
• 2.6 No R&R without accountability, leadership and inclusion
• 2.7 R&R for science communication – in practice
• 2.8 Recognizing and rewarding scientists: Time for bias-free assessments
• 1.11 Implementing R&R: A Dilemma for Early Career Academics
• 1.8 Recognizing supporting roles
• 2.5 Impact-by-design: Drafting, assessing and rewarding performance and learning through impact thinking
• 2.3 Are narrative CVs proving effective in achieving desired outcomes of R&R initiatives?
• Academic Career Track at TU Delft
• 1.10 The Alternative C.V: What should it look like?
• 1.7 Moving debate about new forms of research assessment
• 1.2 Assessment of teacher quality in the University Teaching Practice from Different Perspectives
• 1.1 From individual to collective recognition and rewards
• 1.3 Enabling Diversity - addressing silent assessment
• Werkconferentie SEP 2022 - de presentaties en workshopverslagen