Browse thoughts

003. mmmAcademia: a card game about Recognition and Rewards in Academia (G)

2.3 When and How Does Team Science Improve Science? (G)

Sajedeh Rasti & Daniel Lakens This workshop aims to explore and discuss elements of coordination that contribute to improving research lines as well as how to implement coordination in practice. This workshop involves presentations and interactive discussions and targets anyone who is interested in effective team science and improving the quality of research, from early career researchers to professors and supervisors.

2.2 Journey of Progress game: building a Theory of Change for diverse teams (G)

2.1 Building an academic environment to facilitate transdisciplinary team science (G)

@hildeverbeek, Lotte Krabbenborg, & Scott Douglas (The Young Academy) The Young Academy has conducted a project collective knowledge development, in which it explored how transdisciplinarity in academia can be embedded. In this workshop results from the project will be used to explore with participants how the academic environment can support these transdisciplinary partnerships. What roles and competencies does that require from academics an...

1.10 Gift economies and formal reward systems within Leiden University (G)

Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner & Tjistke Holtrop In this interactive session, we hope to stimulate reflection on how Leiden University staff members deal with conflicts between individual and communal priorities in research and education (broadly construed, incl. publishing, reviewing, maintaining infrastructure). We will kick off the session with a 10 min joint pitch by the organizers that illustrate the above problems in conceptual and practical te...

1.9 Recognizing diverse PhD trajectories: Rethinking doctoral assessment (G)

1.8 How to build a talented team (G)

1.7 Diversifying teams and talents: Recognising the value added by research professionals (G)

1.6 Challenges in the recognition and rewards of Open Science: time to move forward (G)

Michiel de Boer, Prezemek Pawelczak & Ana Ranitovic Experiences from our work in the Dutch Reproducibility Network (NLRN) show that there seems to be a mismatch between the needs of researchers and available support for working according to Open Science principles. In this workshop we hypothesize that we can stimulate Open Science practises by explicitly recognizing and rewarding both academic and non-academic staff in working together on thi...

1.5 How to unlock your team potential: a collaborative workshop (I)

@evelinebraber, @annasmulders, @maudvanroessel To help and challenge teams, team leads and open-up the conversation about talents, competencies, ambitions and complementarity we developed the team based working workshop format. This workshop format aims to trigger teams to not only think about skills and strengths of team members, but also about talents, competencies, and ambitions and how these can be best assigned to the tasks that a team is...

1.4 Teamwork: it's not just a game (G)

@hoogstraat & @kaspergossink The workshop will revolve around playing a custom game to simulate teamwork within universities. In doing so the game will help facilitate the discussion around how we can best reward and recognize different talents and how supporting staff and academic staff can work together more efficiently.

1.3 Acknowledge talent for the future (I)

Chiat Cheong, Maud Vissers Erasmus MC initiated Care-4-Research-Talent (C4RT), a 2-year pilot. The C4RT project team provides structure and programmes to prompt departments to recognize and support broad talent development of individual researchers, while acquiring a solid basis for the departmental strategic talent management. This workshop discusses the implementation of the Career Development Review, a structured approach within the C4RT p...

1.2 PubQuiz: How Evidence-Based is your vision on team science? (G)

1.1 Identity and Expectations in the early career researcher experience (G)

Mollie Etheridge, Katherine Dawson, Marie Collier The dynamic between early career researchers/academics (ECR/ECA) and their principal investigators (PIs)/managers is formative in shaping academic careers. At the University of Cambridge, the Action Research on Research Culture team are exploring how ECRs and research supervisors feel about their respective roles and professional relationships. We are using testimonial-based methods to capture ...

010. De kracht van een multitalentvol team - de serious game als smeerolie

008. Cursor: Open science op de TU/e vergt een gezamenlijke inspanning

004. De bio-sketch: ruimte voor meer dan onderzoek met focus op de mens

009. 'Voor mijn gevoel loopt Nederland voor met de stappen die het zet'

Als promovendus aan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen (RUG) wist de Deen Steffen Eriksen al dat onderwijs zijn grootste inspiratiebron vormt. Hij deed er alles aan om dat zelf te faciliteren. Dankzij het nieuwe UHD2-traject met accent op onderwijs kan hij de omstandigheden die hij zoekt daadwerkelijk vinden. ‘Ik ben heel blij met waar ik nu sta, ik houd van mijn baan.’ Lees het hele interview in ons e-magazine 'Koersen naar de toekomst' hier. Ee...

005. Podcast serie over team science op de website van Nature

Nederlandse universiteiten worstelen met rankings