Browse thoughts

Plenary session: 5 minutes delay

We will start at 10.05

What can I contribute on RRview?

Dear workshopspeaker, How nice to meet you on RRview. If you feel enthusiasm, we would really appreciate it if you could log in from time to time in the coming days and weeks, to continue the conversation around your workshop. We hope the dialogue created during the day will continue within our online environment. You can contribute to the relevance of this forum by: - asking questions to participants in the comments below your workshop text (...

Wel of geen PhD doen? Podcast: 'Twijfeltraject' Universiteit Leiden

LINK TO THE LIVESTREAM

As soon as we know, we will share the online link to the livestream here

Good practice: writing and assessing impact narratives

1.6 Interdisciplinary collaborations: business as unusual?

1.5 How does leadership become everyone's

2.1 Recognizing open science in research assessments: Issues, challenges, and opportunities

Interdisciplinary collaborations: business as unusual?

Sylvia Brugman, Anke de Vrieze Wageningen University and Research The workshop will introduce an assessment strategy that can reward interdisciplinary work as an integrated and embedded part of the academic career. We aim to inspire and explain interdisciplinary scientists need to be rewarded and feel at home in the tenure track. In this interactive workshop, the Centre for Unusual Collaborations (CUCo) wants to illustrate the often difficult ...

1.4 From words to deeds: concrete actions to reward and assess societal impact

Sharon Unsworth, Annelinde Vandenbroucke, Jeanette Mostert RadboudUMC Achieving societal impact through science communication and public engagement is an important part of research, but is not yet rewarded as such. Although universities generally appreciate the efforts made by science communicators – whether they are researchers, communication specialists, or both – structural time for such activities and career prospects for those who pursue ...

2.10 Research Quality Assessment in an era of change: is it possible to develop and operationalize a framework that embraces the current debate and needs of the community?

2.9 Reimaging assessment: how to balance between the individual and the team

2.4 Devising career tracks and criteria: the process as part of the change

1.9 Recognizing the diversity of Open Science Practices across different research communities

2.6 No R&R without accountability, leadership and inclusion

2.7 R&R for science communication – in practice

Recognizing and rewarding scientists: Gathering new ideas and perspectives through veil-of-ignorance reasoning

Thomas Hoogeboom RadboudUMC In 1971, philosopher John Rawls wrote the book 'A theory of justice'. In this book Rawls describes a thought experiment, named 'The veil of Ignorance'. This thought experiment aimed to identify fair governing principles by imagining people choosing their principles from behind a “veil of ignorance,” without knowing their places in the social order. In this workshop, participants will think about better and fairer w...

2.8 Recognizing and rewarding scientists: Time for bias-free assessments

1.11 Implementing R&R: A Dilemma for Early Career Academics

1.8 Recognizing supporting roles