Timeline
- 24 Nov
- Claartje Chajes
- 3
- 101
Guides for reflection the annual conversation, reflection questions and academic career paths. Voor Nederlandse versies kun je terecht bij @hannekeslop.
- 20 Nov
- Claartje Chajes
- 27
Opinie: Je kunt niet objectief bepalen wat een ???uitzonderlijk goed??? proefschrift is | TrouwU bent niet ingelogd.
https://www.trouw.nl/opinie/opinie-je-kunt-niet...De ene promovendus kan zich in alle rust aan zijn onderzoek wijden, de andere heeft zware neventa...
- 20 Nov
- Claartje Chajes
- 35
When you are in a leadership position* in academia ánd you are curious about how to embodie Recognition and Rewards consequently in your behaviour, we genuinly recommend you to listen to the third episode of the Fairly Racognised podcast! Professor Marieke Adriaanse In an open and honest conversation, professor Marieke Adriaanse explains what seduced and motivates her to commit to Recognition & Rewards since ten years. One of her distinctive ...
- 20 Nov
- Claartje Chajes
- 32
bron: website VU, 7 november 2025 Het University Research Chair (URC) programma aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, bedoeld voor academisch talent dat een leiderschapsrol vervult, wordt naast onderzoek explicieter opengesteld voor de focusdomeinen onderwijs en impact. Bij deze nieuwe koers, hoort een nieuwe naam: University Chair (UC). De University Chair (UC) is in lijn met het beleid rond Erkennen & Waarderen. Rector magnificus Jeroen Geurt...
- 17 Nov
- Katreine Blomme
- 1
- 46
In onze jaarverslagen wordt er standaard een paragraaf toegevoegd over erkennen en waarden.
- 17 Nov
- Katreine Blomme
- 1
- 44
In onze jaarverslagen wordt er standaard een paragraaf toegevoegd over erkennen en waarden.
- 17 Nov
- Katreine Blomme
- 1
- 48
In onze jaarverslagen wordt er standaard een paragraaf toegevoegd over erkennen en waarden.
- 14 Nov
- Claartje Chajes
- 48
bron: website Utoday 13/11/2025 Three young academics sent in this opinion piece. They challenge senior scholars’ backlash against the UT’s decision to abolish cum laude, questioning why a title for fewer than 5 percent of PhDs matters more than deeper issues of fairness and inequality. ‘Are we saying the work of more than 95 percent of PhD graduates is barely adequate?’ A PhD defence at the UT, photo taken by Oleksandr Mialyk. Reading the neg...
- 14 Nov
- Claartje Chajes
- 47
bron: website Nature (comment) Universities are in thrall to a rankings system that prioritizes narrow aspects of academic life. Three changes would give institutions the freedom to explore fresh ways of working. University reputations and finances often hinge on their position in global ranking tables. Students use rankings to quickly identify the best place to study — or, at least, what might be perceived to be the best by any future employe...
- 14 Nov
- Marjan van Hunnik
- 9
- 255
De KNAW heeft nu een ontwikkelgerichte gesprekcyclus. Talent, ambitie en ontwikkeling van de medewerker staan centraal. Vanzelfsprekend zijn alle E&W-thema's opgenomen. Máár... de medewerker en leidinggevende 'moeten' niet een vinklijst afwerken. Zij kiezen zelf welk onderwerp ze willen bespreken. En wat we zelf echt een vooruitgang vinden: als je onderzoeksactiviteiten verricht, kun je die bespreken. Welke officiële UFO-functie er ook op je w...
- 11 Nov
- Claartje Chajes
- 41
Needless to say, as a movement we want to grow by learning. We hope to do this by learning from good examples, accepting constructive criticism and incorporating it into our process. We warmly invite you to contribute to this. If you would like to share an experience with us, either on the platform or through other means, please do so. Don't hesitate to either become a member of RRview or send us an email: erkennenwaarderen@unl.nl Thank you!
- 11 Nov
- Claartje Chajes
- 50
source: UKRN The Recognising and rewarding open research toolkit is designed to help universities and other research-performing organisations implement effective recognition and reward for open research through researcher assessment practices. It can support institutions to develop researcher assessment policies and practices that incentivise, enable and increase the use of open research practices by their researchers. The toolkit has been pro...
- 11 Nov
- Claartje Chajes
- 38
In this first episode, programme manager @sanlifaez speaks with Dr @alexrushforth, a scholar in the sociology of science and science policy. His research focuses on research evaluation, bibliometrics, science governance and science and technology studies. Alex recently wrote a critical commentary on the Netherlands’ Recognition & Rewards programme. He argues that: “The initiative has been largely effective in mobilising formal organisational ...
How to stay in touch
- 10 Nov
- 34
Dear colleage, Exactly one year ago we met under purple and pink lights in the Mauritskazerne near Wageningen University. We were talking about the conditions of fruitful and diverse team science. Hopefully you are positively moving forward in the context of Recognition and Rewards! You are receiving this message because you became a member of the Recognition & Rewards online festival envir...
- 10 Nov
- Claartje Chajes
- 43
For the plenary (opening) session first part, please watch here. For the final (closure) session, please wacht here. Curious about the aftermovie? Check it here!
- 10 Nov
- Claartje Chajes
- 32
For the morning (opening) session, please watch here For the afternoon session (closure), please watch here
- 10 Nov
- Claartje Chajes
- 24
- YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=215QQT4gvWgBekijk je favoriete video's, luister naar de muziek die je leuk vindt, upload originele content e...
- 6 Nov
- Claartje Chajes
- ·
- Modified 7 Nov
- 3
- 125
