Browse thoughts

Good practice: writing and assessing impact narratives

1.6 Interdisciplinary collaborations: business as unusual?

1.5 How does leadership become everyone's

2.1 Recognizing open science in research assessments: Issues, challenges, and opportunities

Interdisciplinary collaborations: business as unusual?

Sylvia Brugman, Anke de Vrieze Wageningen University and Research The workshop will introduce an assessment strategy that can reward interdisciplinary work as an integrated and embedded part of the academic career. We aim to inspire and explain interdisciplinary scientists need to be rewarded and feel at home in the tenure track. In this interactive workshop, the Centre for Unusual Collaborations (CUCo) wants to illustrate the often difficult ...

1.4 From words to deeds: concrete actions to reward and assess societal impact

Sharon Unsworth, Annelinde Vandenbroucke, Jeanette Mostert RadboudUMC Achieving societal impact through science communication and public engagement is an important part of research, but is not yet rewarded as such. Although universities generally appreciate the efforts made by science communicators – whether they are researchers, communication specialists, or both – structural time for such activities and career prospects for those who pursue ...

2.10 Research Quality Assessment in an era of change: is it possible to develop and operationalize a framework that embraces the current debate and needs of the community?

2.9 Reimaging assessment: how to balance between the individual and the team

2.4 Devising career tracks and criteria: the process as part of the change

1.9 Recognizing the diversity of Open Science Practices across different research communities

2.6 No R&R without accountability, leadership and inclusion

2.7 R&R for science communication – in practice

Recognizing and rewarding scientists: Gathering new ideas and perspectives through veil-of-ignorance reasoning

Thomas Hoogeboom RadboudUMC In 1971, philosopher John Rawls wrote the book 'A theory of justice'. In this book Rawls describes a thought experiment, named 'The veil of Ignorance'. This thought experiment aimed to identify fair governing principles by imagining people choosing their principles from behind a “veil of ignorance,” without knowing their places in the social order. In this workshop, participants will think about better and fairer w...

2.8 Recognizing and rewarding scientists: Time for bias-free assessments

1.11 Implementing R&R: A Dilemma for Early Career Academics

1.8 Recognizing supporting roles

2.5 Impact-by-design: Drafting, assessing and rewarding performance and learning through impact thinking

2.3 Are narrative CVs proving effective in achieving desired outcomes of R&R initiatives?

Academic Career Track at TU Delft

@meikeblokland, TU Delft (Team Development), Senior policy advisor & @evanvandeleur, TU Delft (Team Development), Project leader Recognition & Rewards TU Delft In the first quarter of 2023 TU Delft introduced the Academic Career Track for Assistant Professors. Assistant Professors hired in this track get the opportunity to develop to Associate Professor within eight years. In this workshop we will give you a short introduction on the Academic ...

1.10 The Alternative C.V: What should it look like?